Capstone Metals — gold and silver IRA dealer
Speak with a specialist: (800) 200-9553Monday – Friday, 7am – 4pm Pacific

Money history

How the dollar went from a weight of silver to a policy decision

Thirteen dated events, each one traceable to a document you can open: the statutory record held by the Library of Congress, the central-bank archive at FRASER, and current Treasury and Federal Reserve data. Facts are labelled as facts, our reading is labelled as our reading, and disputes are left standing as disputes.

How this page is sourced

  • Statute and congressional record. The law as enacted. Highest weight.
  • Executive and agency publications. Orders, rules and agency guidance.
  • Central bank data and history. Official series and the Fed's own account.
  • Official statistics. Treasury, BLS and other agency releases.
  • Archives. FRASER, the National Archives, the Library of Congress.
  • Running estimates. Useful for scale and direction, never the figure of record.
  • Exchanges and industry bodies. Specifications and sector estimates.
  • Reputable secondary reporting. Colour and context only, never a rule.

One deliberate note on the running total: USDebtClock.org is used only for scale and direction. Whenever a debt figure matters, the figure of record is Treasury's Debt to the Penny.

1764 – 1900

When a dollar was a weight

For most of American history the dollar was not a policy target. It was a defined weight of metal, and paper was a claim on that weight. Every argument over money in this era was an argument over who could issue claims and how many.

April 19, 1764

The Currency Act restricts colonial paper money

Parliament barred the American colonies from issuing paper bills of credit as legal tender, forcing debts and taxes toward coin.

FACTthe Act prohibited the colonies from making new paper emissions legal tender and required existing issues to be retired on schedule.

FACTthe colonies had little coin in circulation, so the restriction tightened the available means of payment.

INTERPRETATIONcolonial merchants experienced this as a monetary squeeze imposed from outside, which is why currency grievances sit alongside taxation in the pamphlet literature of the period.

Where people disagree

Some historians treat the Act as ordinary imperial debt-collection policy rather than a deliberate squeeze; the effect on colonial liquidity is agreed, the intent is argued.

Who controls the means of payment shapes every household budget beneath it — a reason to understand money rather than assume it.

Sources for this entry

April 2, 1792

The Coinage Act defines the dollar as a weight of silver

Congress defined the dollar as a specific weight of fine silver, set gold coin standards alongside it, and established the Mint.

FACTthe Act defined the dollar in grains of fine silver and set gold coinage at a fixed ratio to it, creating a bimetallic standard.

FACTit established the United States Mint and set penalties for debasing the coinage.

INTERPRETATIONdefining money as a weight means inflation of the unit requires an act of law rather than a decision of policy — a slower, more visible process than the one we live under now.

Where people disagree

Economists disagree about whether bimetallism was inherently unstable because the legal gold-silver ratio drifted from the market ratio, driving the undervalued metal out of circulation.

Sources for this entry

March 14, 1900

The Gold Standard Act settles the metal question

After three decades of argument between gold and silver, Congress fixed the gold dollar as the standard unit of value.

FACTthe Act made the gold dollar the standard unit of value and required other money to be maintained at parity with it.

FACTit ended the practical prospect of free silver coinage that had dominated the 1896 election.

DISPUTEDwhether the gold standard suited a growing economy was the central economic argument of the era, and it remains argued by economic historians today.

Sources for this entry

1913 – 1944

When money became managed

In thirty years the dollar moved from a weight anyone could hold to a claim managed by an institution, then to a claim ordinary Americans were not permitted to redeem in metal at all.

December 23, 1913

The Federal Reserve Act creates a central bank

Congress established the Federal Reserve System to provide an elastic currency and act as lender of last resort.

FACTthe Act created twelve regional Reserve Banks under a Washington board, with authority to issue Federal Reserve notes and discount commercial paper.

FACTits stated purpose included furnishing an elastic currency after the repeated banking panics of the previous decades.

INTERPRETATIONelasticity is the whole point and the whole argument — a currency that can expand to stop a panic can also expand for other reasons.

Where people disagree

Supporters credit the Fed with ending recurring bank panics. Critics argue it enabled larger cycles and, in the 1930s, made a bad contraction worse. Both readings appear in the Fed's own published history.

Sources for this entry

April 5, 1933

Executive Order 6102 requires gold to be turned in

Americans were required to deliver most gold coin, bullion and gold certificates to Federal Reserve banks in exchange for currency at $20.67 per ounce.

FACTthe order required delivery of gold coin, gold bullion and gold certificates, with stated exemptions including a limited amount of coin, rare and collectible coin, and gold needed in industry, art and trade.

FACTholders received currency at the then-official price of $20.67 per fine troy ounce.

FACTwithin a year the official price was revalued to $35 per ounce under the Gold Reserve Act of 1934.

INTERPRETATIONthe sequence matters more than either step alone. Citizens exchanged metal at one price; the unit was then repriced. That is the plainest illustration of the difference between holding an asset and holding a claim.

Where people disagree

Defenders argue the measure was necessary to stop hoarding and permit reflation in a deflationary collapse. Critics argue it transferred value from savers to the government by decree. The dates and prices are not in dispute.

Prudence is not paranoia. Reading what actually happened, and when, is how a household plans without fear.

Sources for this entry

July 1–22, 1944

Bretton Woods puts the dollar at the centre

Forty-four nations agreed to fix their currencies to the dollar, with the dollar convertible into gold for foreign official holders at $35 an ounce.

FACTthe agreements established fixed parities against the dollar and created the IMF and the World Bank.

FACTconvertibility into gold applied to foreign official holders, not to American citizens, who were still barred from holding monetary gold.

INTERPRETATIONthe dollar's reserve role begins here as a design decision, not as an accident of trade — which is why arguments about de-dollarization are arguments about a designed arrangement.

Sources for this entry

1971 – 2008

When the anchor was cut

After 1971 no major currency was defined by a weight of anything. Prices of goods, houses and metals were all measured in a unit whose quantity is a policy decision.

August 15, 1971

The gold window closes

President Nixon suspended the dollar's convertibility into gold for foreign governments. The suspension was described as temporary; it was never reversed.

FACTon August 15, 1971 convertibility of dollars into gold for foreign official holders was suspended, alongside a wage-and-price freeze and an import surcharge.

FACTfixed parities collapsed over the following two years and major currencies floated.

INTERPRETATIONsince that date the dollar has been a managed unit with no defined metal content, which is the single most important fact for anyone trying to preserve purchasing power over decades.

Where people disagree

Supporters argue floating rates absorbed shocks that fixed rates could not. Critics point to the decline in the dollar's purchasing power since 1971 measured by CPI. Both use the same official data.

Sources for this entry

September 2008 – 2014

The crisis that normalised balance-sheet expansion

Emergency lending and large-scale asset purchases expanded the Federal Reserve's balance sheet from hundreds of billions to trillions.

FACTthe Fed's balance sheet and the M2 money stock both expanded sharply from 2008, and the series are published.

FACTconsumer price inflation stayed low for most of the following decade.

DISPUTEDwhy. Some economists point to demand weakness and the fact new reserves sat in the banking system; others argue the effect showed up in asset prices rather than in the consumer basket.

Sources for this entry

2020 – today

Where we actually stand

The present is measurable. Debt, yields and foreign holdings are all published, and the numbers are large enough that they deserve to be read exactly rather than exaggerated.

March 2020 – 2022

The fastest money growth in the modern series

M2 rose at rates without precedent in the post-war series, followed in 2021–2022 by the highest consumer inflation in four decades.

FACTM2 growth in 2020 was the steepest in the published series, and CPI inflation peaked in mid-2022 at rates last seen in the early 1980s.

DISPUTEDhow much of that inflation was money growth and how much was supply disruption and energy prices. Serious economists land in different places, and the honest answer is a mix whose weights are argued.

INTERPRETATIONfor a household the cause matters less than the effect — a dollar saved in 2019 buys measurably less today, and the BLS calculator will tell you how much.

Sources for this entry

2026

Federal debt above $40 trillion, and who holds it

Total federal debt is above $40 trillion. Foreign investors hold roughly a quarter of it — a large share, and considerably less than the figure usually repeated.

FACTTreasury's Debt to the Penny is the official daily total and reports debt above $40 trillion; USDebtClock.org interpolates between those releases for a live reading.

FACTTreasury's TIC release puts total foreign holdings of Treasury securities near $9.4 trillion, about a quarter of the total — with Japan the largest holder and China third.

INTERPRETATIONthe accurate figure is the more useful one. A quarter of the debt held abroad is a genuine dependency worth planning around; the claim that most of it is foreign-owned is false and lets people dismiss a real concern.

UNKNOWNthe path of long-term yields from here. The 30-year yield is published daily and should be read on the day, not assumed.

Where people disagree

One reading treats high debt with rising long yields as a slow fiscal squeeze on future budgets. Another notes the United States borrows in its own currency and has serviced far higher debt-to-GDP ratios after 1945. Both are arguable from the same data.

State the number correctly and the argument gets stronger, not weaker. Exaggeration is the fastest way to lose a reader who can check.

Sources for this entry

The whole source registry

Every source used above, with what each one actually establishes and when a person last opened it.

Rather ask a person?

A specialist will answer a specific question without a pitch. No account needed, no obligation. Monday – Friday, 7am – 4pm Pacific.

Call (800) 200-9553 Text Email